| ||
January 26, 2006Take risks, be safeThe murder of British backpacker Katherine Horton in Thailand has raised alarm about the potential perils of travel. But while some tragedies can't be avoided, there are ways of balancing adventure with caution, as Ingrid Marson explains Wednesday January 25, 2006 "I think you're really sexy." These are not the words you want to hear when you're alone at night in a deserted part of the Australian outback with an eccentric man whom you thought was only interested in friendship. He became angry when I rejected him and, for the remainder of the long night, I slept fitfully, nervous that he would attack me. I always feel slightly sheepish when I try to explain how I came to be in this position. I had decided to buy a car and had phoned up a guy that restored secondhand cars, whom I'd met in a pub a few weeks earlier. It turned out that he was selling one of his cars and invited me to visit him in Coober Pedy, the outback opal-mining town where he lived, so I could see the car for myself. Nowadays, such a situation would set off alarm bells, but filled with the desire for adventure and comforted by the fact that he was a fundamentalist Christian, I ended up visiting him for a few days. On that particular night, he had persuaded me to go camping in the outback, claiming he wanted to prove that the car was ideal for backpacking. Although the night passed uneventfully, I was shaken for a few days afterwards, even after I had put a few hundred miles between the two of us by catching a bus back to Adelaide. What particularly frightened me was that I hadn't even told anyone who I was planning to stay with, nor where, so if something had happened no one would have known where I was. Neil Thompson, a director at security risk company red24, which has helped backpackers get out of some sticky situations in the past, says that if you go off with a stranger while backpacking it's important to tell someone back home that you're going with that person, and give them a description. "That way we have something to start with if you do go missing," he says. Luckily, the majority of times, even when someone goes missing there is an innocuous explanation - backpackers are notoriously bad at keeping in contact and often do not hear about local events, such as bombs or riots, so do not think to contact their families. But, with the recent murder of Katherine Horton on an idyllic beach in Thailand, the potential risks of travelling are in the forefront of people's minds. "Since her murder, parents are terrified of their children going backpacking," says Tom Griffiths, founder and director of The Gapyear Company. Caroline's Rainbow Foundation, a charity that was set up by the family of murdered backpacker Caroline Stuttle, has produced a video that raises awareness of backpacker safety. The foundation says it has been "inundated" with requests for the video since Katherine's murder. But Griffiths points out that what happened to Katherine is rare. Nine British nationals have been murdered in Thailand since August 2004, while 35,000 Brits are resident there and another 750,000 visited the country last year, according to Foreign Office figures. The same figures show that illness and accidents are a more common cause of death in Thailand - at least 188 British people died in the country last year, "mostly from natural causes and road accidents", says the FCO. Charlie McGrath, the director of Objective Travel Safety, which runs a backpacker safety course, says road traffic accidents are one of his main concerns. When you're catching a bus in London, you don't have to worry about the road-worthiness of the vehicle or the sobriety of the driver, but in developing countries this can be a problem. "Rather than just bumbling on to a bus in Africa, you should check the state of the bus and look at the driver - does he look drunk or tired? Sit near the front of the bus so you can keep an eye on the driver," he says. McGrath maintains that being aware of what is going on around you is the best way to avoid getting in trouble, whether that means avoiding crime or getting involved in an accident, or staying healthy. "The key thing for backpackers or young travellers is that they've got to think on their feet," he says. "In the UK, when you talk to a policeman you don't think, 'is he corrupt?' and you don't think, 'is this taxi going to take me to where I want to go'. You have to be more aware overseas." Although being alert and confident can help you avoid becoming a victim of crime when travelling, there are also steps you can take to minimise the impact of crime. John Cummings, director of Safetrek, an alternative backpacker safety course, advises that you carry your valuables with you, rather than leaving them in a potentially insecure room, and distribute them about your person. "Take a money belt, a day pack, a dummy wallet and a real wallet with you. A thief or mugger is not going to have a checklist - they just want something that is of value to them," he says. If you do face a mugger, simply hand over your money, rather than risk your life, says David Marks, the co-founder of Caroline's Rainbow Foundation. "If you are approached by a mugger, give your goods over - don't fight back and don't try to be brave," he says. "You've got to realise that in certain countries, life is a lot cheaper." To prepare for the worst-case scenario in which you do lose everything, keep some local currency in a safe place, such as sewn into your clothes, or under the insole of your shoe. This money will allow you to travel to the nearest UK embassy, where they can issue an emergency passport and help you contact family or friends to get help with money or tickets. While crime and road accidents are relatively rare, one area where backpackers take big risks is with travel insurance. One in three backpackers aged between 18 and 24 travels without insurance, according to a Gapyear Company survey in 2004. If these backpackers fell seriously ill they could end up facing steep medical bills, which the majority of parents could not afford to pay without taking out a loan. "It's very easy to rack up a bill of £50,000 to £100,000 with medical problems - for the majority of parents this would mean remortgaging their house," he says. Although it is important to take care of yourself when travelling, it is equally important to remember that most tricky situations can be easily resolved by believing in yourself and treating people with respect. Go into situations with your eyes open, but also trust that people usually mean well. During the year I spent travelling, the majority of the people I met were genuine and hospitable - from the Malaysian woman who invited me to her home and fed me a sumptuous meal of freshly caught crabs; to the Burmese man who arranged for a car to take me back to Mandalay when I was too ill to catch a bus; to the backpacker who looked out for me while we travelled around Cambodia. And it is these examples of human kindness that I remember much more clearly than any of the hiccups along the way. Top five tips Posted by bkleinhe at 06:46 PM
Hide Comments
| Add your comment| TrackBack (0)
|Find more in Backpacking
Comments on Take risks, be safe
January 12, 2006Review: Backpacking loses its appeal in 'Hostel'By DAVID CARRIER Backpacking through Europe has never appealed to me. If Eli Roth, the director of "Hostel," has his way it may never appeal to anyone again. Roth's sophomore effort presents viewers with three typically hormonal young men: Paxton (Jay Hernandez), the cargo-pant-wearing frat boy; Josh (Derek Richardson), the sensitive, would-be writer, whose idea of a pick-up line is mentioning Kafka to a Czech girl; and the token goofy foreigner, Icelandic Oli (Eythor Gudjonsson). Together they spend the first half of the movie roaming the streets of Amsterdam smoking pot and enjoying the women of the red light district. Because they feel Amsterdam is too commercial, they are pleased when a shady Russian character turns them on to a remote hostel in eastern Europe (the first hint of trouble) where chesty blondes await young Americans, eager to do anything imaginable. Ever-seeking the next exotic thrill, the trio board a train bound for Bratislava. Plot to shanghai youth travelers Better exchange rates, a hostel that looks like a four-star hotel and the most siliconed women on earth welcome the boys. But because this is a primarily a horror movie, all this good fortune can only foreshadow extreme trouble. The whole operation is revealed as an elaborate plot to shanghai youth travelers. Kidnapees are brought to an abandoned warehouse where rich men pay large amounts of money to maim them with scalpels, blowtorches, chain saws, meat-hooks, kitchen sinks and, well, the point is that "Hostel" gets a little graphic with the fake blood and oozing appendages. It's definitely not for the kids, or the squeamish. Like Roth's first feature, 2002's "Cabin Fever," the movie combines horror and comedy in a special way. Gags like the ones involving a roving band of vicious street kids who kill for bubble gum ease the tension the disturbing torture scenes create. It's a testament to Roth's enthusiasm for his craft that he can make his audience squirm as much as they laugh. There are even the gratuitous blood-splatterings that draw nervous chuckles. Aside from its sometimes over-the-top gore, "Hostel" explores some mature themes. The premise of torture and sadism as sport is not anything new - Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" comes to mind most prominently - but by painting his heroes as immoral deviants themselves, Roth challenges us to feel sorry for them. Ironic, too, is the realization that the three boys become objects to be sold the same way the prostitutes they solicited were. A large number of bizarre rumors are floating around the internet concerning "Hostel," and all of them are adding to its hype. Most involve viewers passing out or vomiting while watching it, or theaters calling ambulances. The strangest, however, recounts how Roth came up with the idea for the movie, but I'll leave that tidbit to the more interested readers to find. "Hostel" was produced by Quentin Tarantino, an attribute that helped the film reach the top of the box office in its first weekend, collecting a respectable $19.5 million. But the movie should not be considered good based on Tarantino's name recognition. Rather, I feel "Hostel" is worthy of praise because of the of its gutsy quality. It does not pull its punches, and writer/director Eli Roth is one fellow to watch out for. Posted by bkleinhe at 12:32 PM
Hide Comments
| Add your comment| TrackBack (0)
|Find more in Backpacking
Comments on Review: Backpacking loses its appeal in 'Hostel'
|
||